Actions

RadioReference Wiki

Difference between revisions of "Ka3jjz"

From The RadioReference Wiki

(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
a. [http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm MultiPSK] -has a USD45 registration fee for some modes, but is a very capable decoder, if you can get past the huge number of menus. Patrick doesn't seem to believe in pull downs...
 
  
b. [http://www.saharlow.com/technology/sigmira/ Sigmira] - Free, and it will handle Stanag4285 signals (it certainly won't de-crypt the ones that are encrypted, but that's to be expected)
 
 
c. [http://www.radioaficion.com/HamNews/archivo/vagabundos-del-dial/5814-sorcerer-decoder.html Sorcerer]- Free, Copies tons of modes most other free decoders won't decode
 
 
d. PC-ALE - Free (available from [http://www.hflink.com/ HFlink.org]), and it handles ALE signals. It should be noted that MultiPSK does too, but it's handy to have more than one decoder for a particular mode, and I'll get to why that's true in a moment
 
 
e. PC-HFDL- Free (available from the [https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/hfdl/info HFDL Yahoo group]), and it handles HFDL. Again, MultiPSK handles these as well
 
 
f. [https://github.com/IanWraith/Rivet/ Rivet] - Free - handles some rather obscure modes, some used by the Russians, others of interest to the folks in the Numbers and Oddities section of the UDXF
 
 
g [http://digtrx.software.informer.com/ Digtrx] - Free - MIGHT be useful if you chase numbers stations...
 
 
Why overlap the decoders? Simple - one decoder might use a somewhat different algorithm for decoding that works better with your receiver and/or PC. There's no real way of determining this without experimentation.
 

Revision as of 15:27, 19 December 2014