Difference between revisions of "ProVoice"
From The RadioReference Wiki
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ProVoice is MA/Com | + | '''ProVoice''' is MA/Com's (formerly Ericsson) implementation of [[IMBE]] digital modulation. It is ''not'' [[APCO-25]] compliant, but does use the same [[IMBE]] [[vocoder]] developed by [http://www.dvsinc.com/ DVSI Inc]. The technical difference between ProVoice and the APCO Project-25 standard is how error correction and modulation is provided to transmit the data. |
| − | + | El Pase and San Antonio, Texas, the State of Florida, and St Tammany Parish, Louisiana, are using ProVoice [[EDACS]] or are in the process of building ProVoice systems. | |
| − | There is | + | EDACS ProVoice systems use the [http://www.radioreference.com/digital/dig/edacs-norm.wav MA/Co EDACS control channel]. |
| + | |||
| + | There is no scanner available today that can monitor EDACS ProVoice Digital voice. | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 12 February 2006
ProVoice is MA/Com's (formerly Ericsson) implementation of IMBE digital modulation. It is not APCO-25 compliant, but does use the same IMBE vocoder developed by DVSI Inc. The technical difference between ProVoice and the APCO Project-25 standard is how error correction and modulation is provided to transmit the data.
El Pase and San Antonio, Texas, the State of Florida, and St Tammany Parish, Louisiana, are using ProVoice EDACS or are in the process of building ProVoice systems.
EDACS ProVoice systems use the MA/Co EDACS control channel.
There is no scanner available today that can monitor EDACS ProVoice Digital voice.